From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Millville v. Everingham

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 18, 1925
101 N.J.L. 566 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Argued March 15, 1925 —

Decided May 18, 1925.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 293.

For the appellant, Louis H. Miller.

For the respondent, Henry O. Burt.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Millville v. Everingham

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 18, 1925
101 N.J.L. 566 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Millville v. Everingham

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF MILLVILLE, APPELLANT, v. HOWARD EVERINGHAM, RESPONDENT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 18, 1925

Citations

101 N.J.L. 566 (N.J. 1925)
129 A. 921

Citing Cases

State v. Maier

The opinions are not helpful to our present inquiry because there was not a majority of the court voting for…

Bd. of Health, Weehawken Tp. v. N.Y. Central R. Co.

peachment, or in cases cognizable by justices of the peace, or arising in the army or navy or in the militia,…