From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. United States

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 21, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv535-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 21, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv535-MHT (WO)

11-21-2013

THOMAS JOHNSON MILLS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 35) is adopted.
(2) The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mills v. United States

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 21, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv535-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Mills v. United States

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS JOHNSON MILLS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 21, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv535-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 21, 2013)

Citing Cases

Morris v. Estes

Nor has Morris provided any excuse for why he has not produced records or an affidavit from Dr. Chandler.…

Chandler v. United States

Indeed, although Mr. Chandler asserts that the testimony would have only been favorable to him, "evidence…