From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 14, 1994
642 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2306.

September 14, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Edward Rodgers, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Susan D. Cline, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING


The opinion of this court issued June 22, 1994 is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted. The motions for rehearing and rehearing en banc filed by appellant, considered in light of this substituted opinion, are denied.

We affirm the trial court's assessment of $200.00 for costs of prosecution against appellant since he failed to object to imposition of such costs during the sentencing hearing. See Thomas v. State, 633 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). We reverse, however, the amount of court costs imposed in the trial court's order and remand with instructions to correct that amount to reflect an assessment of $295.00 in court costs.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, C.J., HERSEY, J., and DAUKSCH, JAMES C., JR., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Mills v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 14, 1994
642 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Mills v. State

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE D. MILLS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 14, 1994

Citations

642 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Norman v. State

Having been provided with notice and an opportunity to be heard, defendant agreed to the imposition of all…