From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 8, 2004
880 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 2004)

Opinion

No. SC01-1862.

July 8, 2004.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict, First District — Case No. 1D00-2790, (Bay County).

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Phil Patterson, Assistant Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Robert R. Wheeler, Bureau Chief, and Karen M. Holland, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.


We have for review Mills v. State, 791 So.2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), which expressly and directly conflicts with our decision in Harvey v. State, 848 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)( 3), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, quash the decision of the First District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decisions in Harvey and Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452 (Fla. 2003).

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mills v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 8, 2004
880 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 2004)
Case details for

Mills v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mark D. MILLS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 8, 2004

Citations

880 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 2004)

Citing Cases

Mills v. State

On appeal, this Court affirmed the resentencing, by a per curiam affirmance with a citation to Harvey v.…

Amer. Wall Sys. v. Madison International Grp.

The district court expressly cited a decision under review in this Court. See, e.g., Mills v. State, 880…