In Mills, a bank employee sued various parties for damages because she was injured when the heel of her shoe punctured a section of carpeting that had been laid over an uncovered utility hole.
Summary of this case from Sullivan v. Scoular Grain Co. of Utah1991.
On July 30, 1992, review dismissed and cause remanded to Court of Appeals, Sixth Appellate District.
In Mills, a bank employee sued various parties for damages because she was injured when the heel of her shoe punctured a section of carpeting that had been laid over an uncovered utility hole.
Summary of this case from Sullivan v. Scoular Grain Co. of Utahincluding immune employers
Summary of this case from Sullivan v. Scoular Grain Co. of UtahFull title:Mills v. MMM Carpets, Inc
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Jan 1, 1991
For example, the California Court of Appeal recently ruled in a case substantially similar to the case at…
Walker v. Tensor Mach., Ltd.Immunity does not mean that a party is not at fault; it simply means that the party cannot be sued.”…