From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Nov 10, 2023
No. 03-23-00530-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 10, 2023)

Opinion

03-23-00530-CV

11-10-2023

Appellant, Bryan Miller// Cross-Appellant, Claudia Miller v. Appellee, Claudia Miller// Cross-Appellee, Bryan Miller


FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-21-001119, THE HONORABLE MADELEINE CONNOR, JUDGE PRESIDING

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant and cross-appellee Bryan Miller challenges the trial court's corrected final decree of divorce, signed on September 13, 2023. Bryan has filed a motion requesting that we abate the appeal for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law that were not issued by the trial court after he requested them and gave notice that they were past due. See Tex.R.Civ.P. 296; id. R. 297. Bryan certified that he tried but was unable to confer with Claudia's attorney about the motion. Although more than ten days have passed since Bryan filed his motion, Claudia has not filed a response.

Because the parties share the same last name, for clarity, we will refer to the parties by their first names.

The family code provides that, upon timely request, the trial court shall make written findings of fact and conclusions of law when the trial court has rendered judgment dividing the parties' estate in a divorce suit, when the court varies from the standard possession order, and when the court renders a child-support order. See Tex. Fam. Code §§ 6.711, 153.258, 154.130. When the trial court fails to make fact findings and conclusions of law after a party has complied with the rules in making a request, the error is presumed harmful. Martinez v. Martinez, No. 03-16-00818-CV, 2017 WL 3897309, at *1 (Tex. App.-Austin Aug. 25, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam) (abatement) (citing, in part, Tenery v. Tenery, 932 S.W.2d 29, 29 (Tex. 1996)). Error is harmful if it prevents an appellant from properly presenting a case to the appellate court. Id. (citing Tenery, 932 S.W.2d at 30); see also Tex.R.App.P. 44.1(a)(2). In light of the presumption, and from the record before us, we conclude that Bryan will be harmed from the trial court's failure to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law and that such findings and conclusions are necessary for a proper presentation of his appeal.

Accordingly, we grant Bryan's motion, abate this appeal, and remand this cause to the trial court for the entry of the necessary findings. A supplemental record containing the findings and conclusions shall be filed with this Court thirty days from the date of this order. This appeal will be reinstated after the supplemental clerk's record is filed.

It is ordered.

Abated and Remanded


Summaries of

Miller v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Nov 10, 2023
No. 03-23-00530-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Miller v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:Appellant, Bryan Miller// Cross-Appellant, Claudia Miller v. Appellee…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Nov 10, 2023

Citations

No. 03-23-00530-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 10, 2023)