From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Crews

Supreme Court of Florida.
Mar 28, 2014
139 So. 3d 299 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC14–113.

2014-03-28

Gregory MILLER, Petitioner(s) v. Michael D. CREWS, Etc., Respondent(s).


To the extent that petitioner seeks review of his judgment of conviction, because the Court has determined that relief is not authorized, this case is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). To the extent that petitioner requests that this Court review the claim(s) raised in his habeas petition before the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit, in and for Gadsden County, the petition is denied as successive. See Jenkins v. Wainwright, 322 So.2d 477 (Fla.1975) (declaring that once a petitioner seeks relief in a particular court by means of a petition for extraordinary writ, he has picked his forum and is not entitled to a second or third opportunity for the same relief by the same writ in a different court). Any motions or other requests for relief are also denied.

PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Miller v. Crews

Supreme Court of Florida.
Mar 28, 2014
139 So. 3d 299 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Miller v. Crews

Case Details

Full title:Gregory MILLER, Petitioner(s) v. Michael D. CREWS, Etc., Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Mar 28, 2014

Citations

139 So. 3d 299 (Fla. 2014)