From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 5, 1996
676 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-3023.

July 5, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Volusia County, William C. Johnson, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Dan D. Hallenberg, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael D. Crotty, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Steven Meyers appeals his judgment and sentence for lewd and lascivious act in the presence of a child. We affirm the judgment and sentence, but we strike the assessments for investigative costs imposed pursuant to section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1993). The record does not establish that the state requested investigative costs or documented the amount of costs incurred by law enforcement. See § 939.01(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). This is in derogation of the statute. Absent a request along with documentation, the imposition of investigative costs is error. See Madison v. State, 664 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Brown v. State, 657 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). We remand for reimposition of the investigative costs, if appropriate, once the state complies with section 939.01(1). See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Judgment and Sentence AFFIRMED; Investigative Costs STRICKEN; and REMANDED.

PETERSON, C.J., and DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Meyers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 5, 1996
676 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Meyers v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN MEYERS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 5, 1996

Citations

676 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Bisson v. State

Imposition of investigative costs under these circumstances is illegal. Walker v. State, 692 So.2d 318 (Fla.…