From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mesfree Realty Corporation v. Huyler's

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 28, 1934
153 Misc. 667 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

November 28, 1934.

Appeal from the City Court of New York, County of New York.

Jerome Eisner [ Henry I. Fillman of counsel], for the appellant.

Wilzin Halperin [ Michael Halperin and Robert Morris of counsel], for the respondent.


A lease may not be avoided by a tenant in possession solely because the landlord has failed to obtain a certificate of occupancy. Something more must be shown — a violation of some provision which directly and substantially concerns the public health, safety and welfare. ( Minton v. Schulte, Inc., 153 Misc. 195.)

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

All concur; present, LYDON, HAMMER and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

Mesfree Realty Corporation v. Huyler's

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 28, 1934
153 Misc. 667 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

Mesfree Realty Corporation v. Huyler's

Case Details

Full title:MESFREE REALTY CORPORATION, Respondent, v. HUYLER'S, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1934

Citations

153 Misc. 667 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
275 N.Y.S. 816

Citing Cases

Matter of Herzog v. Thompson

It must be shown that the landlord has violated some provision of law which directly and substantially…

56-70 58th St. Holding Corp. v. Fedders-Quigan

We need not determine whether that fact, standing alone, justified the tenant in rescinding the lease. (Cf.…