From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McReynolds v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 3, 1942
6 So. 2d 602 (Ala. Crim. App. 1942)

Opinion

2 Div. 696.

March 3, 1942.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Wilcox County; John Miller, Judge.

Fred McReynolds was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Godbold Godbold, of Camden, for appellant.

Thos. S. Lawson, Atty, Gen., and Wm. N. McQueen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Appellant was convicted of the offense of grand larceny.

We see nothing to discuss. The record is regular in all respects. There were no exceptions reserved on the trial — or rulings by which an exception is presumed.

Appellant, after the trial, procured attorneys — two good ones — who have filed a brief here.

But their principal — in effect, sole — contention is that appellant ought to have a new trial because he had no counsel on his trial below.

He asked for no such counsel, and cannot now complain.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

McReynolds v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 3, 1942
6 So. 2d 602 (Ala. Crim. App. 1942)
Case details for

McReynolds v. State

Case Details

Full title:McREYNOLDS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 3, 1942

Citations

6 So. 2d 602 (Ala. Crim. App. 1942)
6 So. 2d 602

Citing Cases

Brackin v. State

Failure to object and reserve exceptions to proceedings in lower court and qualifications of jurors waives…