Opinion
No. SC95949.
Opinion filed August 24, 2000.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict, First District — Case No. 1D98-858 (Duval County).
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Fred Parker Bingham II, Assistant Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent.
We have for review McLean v. State, 732 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) wherein the First District Court of Appeal cited to Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), approved, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S482 (fla. June 15, 2000), which was then pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1981).
Consistent with our decision in Maddox v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S367 (Fla. May 11, 2000) (approving Locke), we determine that McLean's unpreserved claim relating to the trial court's failure to announce the imposition of restitution at his sentencing hearing and to advise him of the right to have a hearing on the amount of restitution does not rise to the level of fundamental error which may be reviewed for the first time on direct appeal. Further, based on our decision in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137 (Fla. Feb. 17, 2000), we quash the district court's affirmance of McLean's sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with the sentencing guidelines in effect before the relevant amendments made to chapter 95-184 became effective.
McLean has standing to challenge chapter 95-184 on single subject rule grounds. See Trapp v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S429 (Fla. June 1, 2000).
It is so ordered.
SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
WELLS, C.J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion.
I concur in respect to the Maddox issue. I dissent as to the Heggs issue.