From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLane v. Youngblood

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 21, 1989
544 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-00602.

June 21, 1989.

Appeal from nonfinal order of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Edward H. Ward, Judge.

Pamela K. Akin, Acting City Atty., and Ernest Mayor, Jr., Asst. City Atty., Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance by appellee.


In this case involving the forfeiture of an automobile pursuant to sections 932.701- 932.704, Florida Statutes (1987), we reverse the order granting appellee possession of the automobile during the pendency of the forfeiture proceeding. See City of Pompano Beach v. General Mobile Home Brokers, Inc., 493 So.2d 97 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McLane v. Youngblood

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 21, 1989
544 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

McLane v. Youngblood

Case Details

Full title:AUSTIN C. McLANE, AS CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF TAMPA POLICE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 21, 1989

Citations

544 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

City of Miami v. Barclay

Further, a defendant is not entitled to have his vehicle returned during the pendency of the forfeiture…

City of Coral Gables v. Rodriguez

"[A] defendant is not entitled to have his vehicle returned during the pendency of the forfeiture…