From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 20, 1993
612 So. 2d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 91-01772.

January 20, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Manuel Menendez, Jr., J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dell H. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


James McLain seeks reversal of his convictions and sentences. We affirm the convictions without comment, but we remand one sentence to correct an improper habitual offender designation.

The jury found McLain guilty of attempted sexual battery upon a child less than 12, a first degree felony, sexual battery upon a child less than 12, a capital felony, and lewd and lascivious conduct, a felony of the second degree. At the penalty phase, the trial court imposed consecutive sentences. For the attempted sexual battery, McLain received life in prison; for the capital sexual battery, he received life with a twenty-five year minimum mandatory term; and for the offense of lewd and lascivious conduct, he received a thirty year prison term. McLain was declared a habitual felon and each of the three written sentences reflected that determination.

McLain correctly states that the highest degree of felony contemplated by the habitual offender statute is a first degree felony punishable by life. See § 775.084(4), Fla. Stat. (1989). A defendant convicted of a capital felony shall be confined to life imprisonment with a minimum mandatory term of twenty five years. See § 775.082(1), Fla. Stat. (1989). Capital felonies are not subject to the enhancement provisions of section 775.084. See Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1992); Mishoe v. State, 601 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). Because McLain could not be habitualized for the capital sexual battery, the written sentence adjudging him a habitual offender is erroneous.

Accordingly, we remand this matter with directions to strike from the sentence for the capital felony the notation designating McLain a habitual offender.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.


Summaries of

McLain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 20, 1993
612 So. 2d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

McLain v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EDWARD McLAIN, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 20, 1993

Citations

612 So. 2d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Parrimon v. State

This was error because a capital felony is not subject to the enhancement provisions of section 775.084,…

Biles v. State

We agree and vacate his sentence as an habitual offender. See McLain v. State, 612 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA…