From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFaul v. Valenzuela

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Lubbock Division
Feb 10, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV-165-C ECF (N.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV-165-C ECF.

February 10, 2011


ORDER


The United States Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation on September 14, 2010, and Plaintiff filed his objections on September 22, 2010.

The undersigned United States District Judge has made an independent examination of the record in this case and has examined the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as well as the specific objections of the Plaintiff. The Court finds that Plaintiff's objections should be overruled in all things, and the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

It is, therefore, ORDERED:

1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff take nothing on his claims against Defendants.
3. All relief not expressly granted and all pending motions should be denied.

Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

Plaintiff is advised that if he appeals this Order, he will be required to pay the appeal fee of $455.00 pursuant to the PLRA, and he must submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a 6-month Certificate of Inmate Trust Account at the same time he files his notice of appeal.

The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff, the Defendants' Attorney(s), the Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, and the Court Coordinator for the TDCJ Classification and Records.

Dated February 10, 2011.


Summaries of

McFaul v. Valenzuela

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Lubbock Division
Feb 10, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV-165-C ECF (N.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2011)
Case details for

McFaul v. Valenzuela

Case Details

Full title:ANSON B. McFAUL, Institutional ID No. 1006030, SID No. 5705111, Plaintiff…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Lubbock Division

Date published: Feb 10, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV-165-C ECF (N.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2011)

Citing Cases

Romero v. Owens

A trial court is not required to appoint counsel for an indigent party in a civil rights lawsuit unless the…

Keys v. Torres

Due process rights exist only to protect substantive interests. McFaul v. Valenzuela, 684 F.3d 564, 579 (5th…