From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. City of Fairfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 20, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-03872-VEH (N.D. Ala. Mar. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-03872-VEH

03-20-2013

DAMIEN MCDANIEL, Plaintiff v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD, et al., Defendants


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 19, 2013, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. To date, no objections have been filed by plaintiff or defendants.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that defendants' Motion to Dismiss be granted and this action dismissed with prejudice.

A separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered contemporaneously herewith.

______________________________

VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McDaniel v. City of Fairfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 20, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-03872-VEH (N.D. Ala. Mar. 20, 2013)
Case details for

McDaniel v. City of Fairfield

Case Details

Full title:DAMIEN MCDANIEL, Plaintiff v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 20, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-03872-VEH (N.D. Ala. Mar. 20, 2013)

Citing Cases

Ray v. Judicial Corr. Servs.

Clearly, a greater level of factual development is required to make such an evaluation, reinforcing the…