From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCray v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 20, 2021
315 So. 3d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D19-4679

04-20-2021

Bruce MCCRAY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Bruce McCray, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Bruce McCray, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of Petitioner's response docketed January 19, 2021, the second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Logan v. State , 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003) (holding that, generally, a defendant has no right to represent himself in an extraordinary writ petition in the appellate court while he is represented by counsel in the criminal case pending in the lower tribunal); Marsh v. State , 919 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (finding a pro se petition for writ of mandamus a nullity where petitioner was represented by counsel below in an involuntary civil commitment proceeding).

Lewis, Roberts, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McCray v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 20, 2021
315 So. 3d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

McCray v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE MCCRAY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 20, 2021

Citations

315 So. 3d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)