From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCorvey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 30, 2004
872 So. 2d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Summary

concluding that the trial court sentenced the appellant under a misconception about its discretion in sentencing and reversing the appellant's sentence and remanding for the trial court to reconsider the sentence in light of its discretion to depart if the facts warranted

Summary of this case from Childers v. State

Opinion

Case No. 1D03-3033.

Opinion filed April 30, 2004.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Linda Nobles, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General; Karen Armstrong, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


In this direct appeal of a sentence imposed following revocation of community control, the appellant claims that the trial court erred when it sentenced him to the lowest permissible sentence under the Criminal Punishment Code after expressing the erroneous belief that it could not consider as reasons for a downward departure any factors that were not specifically enumerated in section 921.0026, Florida Statutes (2003). The appellant is correct; the statutory mitigating circumstances are not exclusive. See § 921.0026(2), Fla. Stat. (2003); see also e.g., State v. VanBebber, 848 So.2d 1046, 1048 (Fla. 2003); State v. Tyrrell, 807 So.2d 122, 125 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

We do not reach the question of whether the non-statutory reasons proffered by the appellant would have been sufficient to support a downward departure. Nonetheless, the trial court sentenced the appellant "under a misconception about its discretion in sentencing." Hines v. State, 817 So.2d 964, 965-66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Because we are unable to determine from this record whether the trial court would have imposed a downward departure if it understood that it was allowed to consider non-statutory factors, we reverse the appellant's sentence and "remand for the trial court to reconsider the sentence in light of its discretion to depart if the facts so warrant." Id.

BARFIELD, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED


Summaries of

McCorvey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 30, 2004
872 So. 2d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

concluding that the trial court sentenced the appellant under a misconception about its discretion in sentencing and reversing the appellant's sentence and remanding for the trial court to reconsider the sentence in light of its discretion to depart if the facts warranted

Summary of this case from Childers v. State

explaining that “the statutory mitigating circumstances are not exclusive”

Summary of this case from State v. Robinson

addressing appellant's claim that the trial court erred when it expressed the belief that it could not consider any factors not enumerated in section 921.0026 for a downward departure sentence

Summary of this case from Rochester v. State
Case details for

McCorvey v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARIO M. McCORVEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 30, 2004

Citations

872 So. 2d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

At the same time, the Court acknowledged an exception to the general rule exists when the trial court denies…

State v. Robinson

The mitigating factors and circumstances that may be considered by the trial court in determining whether to…