From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayo v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Mar 13, 2012
CIVIL NO. 3:10CV866-HEH (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 3:10CV866-HEH

03-13-2012

LINDA MAYO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (R&R) entered on February 24, 2012 (Dk. No, 16). The time to file objections has expired and neither party has objected to the R&R. Having considered the matter and deeming it otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court;
(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dk. No. 11) and Motion to Remand (Dk. No. 12) are DENIED;
(3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dk. No. 14) is GRANTED;
(4) The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and
(5) This case is CLOSED.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and all counsel of record.

It is so ORDERED.

______________________

Henry E. Hudson

United Slates District Judge

Date: ______________________

Richmond, VA


Summaries of

Mayo v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Mar 13, 2012
CIVIL NO. 3:10CV866-HEH (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Mayo v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LINDA MAYO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Mar 13, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 3:10CV866-HEH (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

Virginia H. v. O'Malley

The Social Security Administration has not adopted a bright line rule or numerical definition for…

Marco R. M. v. Kijakazi

The Social Security Administration has not adopted a bright line rule for a certain number of jobs to qualify…