From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maximino v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 15, 1999
745 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

requiring new VOP hearing, where revocation was based on two new offenses, and defendant had been acquitted after jury trial of one offense and second conviction was reversed on appeal

Summary of this case from Douglas v. State

Opinion

No. 99-0896.

Opinion filed December 15, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Robert A. Hawley, Judge; L.T. No. 96-698.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant's probation was revoked after he was charged with burglary and sexual battery. After the revocation, he was acquitted of the sexual battery, and, in Maximino v. State, 747 So.2d 448 (Fla. 4th DCA, 1999), we reversed his conviction for burglary for a new trial. In light of these developments, we have concluded that the revocation of probation should be reversed and reconsidered by the trial court.

FARMER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maximino v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 15, 1999
745 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

requiring new VOP hearing, where revocation was based on two new offenses, and defendant had been acquitted after jury trial of one offense and second conviction was reversed on appeal

Summary of this case from Douglas v. State
Case details for

Maximino v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROQUE MAXIMINO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 15, 1999

Citations

745 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Gonzales v. State

The fact that appellant was acquitted of aggravated battery by a jury does not mean that his probation could…

Douglas v. State

See, e.g., Stallworth v. State, 21 So.3d 84 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (holding that defendant should receive an…