From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mauss v. Mauss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 1994
203 A.D.2d 101 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 12, 1994

Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Karen Burnstein, J.).


Although petitioner's excuse for her delay in enforcing the parties' 1982 support order is weak, delay alone is insufficient to bar a claim on the ground of laches (Matter of Department of Social Servs. v Wright, 112 A.D.2d 159, 160), and respondent's claim of lack of knowledge that petitioner would seek to enforce the order and prejudice as a result of the delay are not convincing (see, Maule v Kaufman, 33 N.Y.2d 58). We have considered respondent's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Mauss v. Mauss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 1994
203 A.D.2d 101 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Mauss v. Mauss

Case Details

Full title:FREDA MAUSS, Respondent, v. MARC MAUSS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 101 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 840

Citing Cases

Macon v. Arnlie Realty Co.

Nor are we persuaded by Mount Vernon's argument that the fifth-party action is barred by laches. A claim of…