From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 3, 2004
889 So. 2d 893 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 2D04-2925.

December 3, 2004.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Ronald N. Ficarrotta, Judge.


Douglas Matthews seeks review of the order denying his motion to withdraw plea. We reverse.

Matthews' motion to withdraw plea was erroneously filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Because it was not sworn and signed by Matthews, the circuit court could not treat it as a motion to withdraw plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Matthews' direct appeal is currently pending in this court; therefore, the circuit court was without jurisdiction to rule on his motion. See Day v. State, 770 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (holding that effective January 13, 2000, a party may not file a rule 3.800(a) motion during the pendency of a direct appeal); see also Bunkley v. State, 800 So.2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that a trial court is without jurisdiction to rule on a motion for postconviction relief during the pendency of a direct appeal). Such a prematurely filed motion must be dismissed by a circuit court and may be refiled after the direct appeal is final. Ortiz v. State, 768 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Therefore, we reverse the order of the circuit court and remand with instructions to dismiss Matthews' motion to withdraw plea without prejudice to any right he may have to refile pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 after his direct appeal is final.

Reversed and remanded.

CANADY and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Matthews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 3, 2004
889 So. 2d 893 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Matthews v. State

Case Details

Full title:Douglas MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 3, 2004

Citations

889 So. 2d 893 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Hogarth v. State

Instead, the trial court should have dismissed the motion with leave to refile after the direct appeal was…

Baker v. State

Rule 3.800(a) specifically provides that a 3.800(a) motion may not be filed "during the pendency of a direct…