From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Williams v. Mullineaux

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 20, 2000
271 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

April 20, 2000.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Delaware County (Estes, J.), entered June 9, 1999, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, for custody of the parties' child.

Spain, J. P., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


Petitioner and respondent are the parents of a child born in 1988. In 1993, following the parties' divorce and petitioner's relocation to Florida, Family Court approved the parties' stipulation granting physical custody of the child to respondent and visitation to petitioner in the Town of Walton, Delaware County, where respondent and the child resided. Thereafter, in April 1999, petitioner filed an application seeking sole custody of the child based upon an alleged change in circumstances and the child's best interest. Family Court dismissed the petition without an evidentiary hearing and this appeal by petitioner ensued.

We are persuaded by petitioner's contention that Family Court erred in dismissing the petition without first conducting an evidentiary hearing. Liberally construing the allegations of the petition, i.e., that a change in custody is warranted by petitioner's recent move back to Delaware County, respondent's alleged intent to relocate outside the area, his interference with petitioners visitation and improper punishment of the child, we find that they "at least barely set forth sufficient facts which, if established at an evidentiary hearing, could afford a basis for granting the relief sought" ( Matter of Green blatt v. Van Deusen, 87 A.D.2d 713, 714; see, Matter of Davies v. Davies, 223 A.D.2d 884, 886-887). Under these circumstances, an evidentiary hearing was necessary because Family Court did not possess sufficient information to enable it to engage in an independent comprehensive review of the child's best interest ( see, Matter of Kenneth H. v. Barbara G., 256 A.D.2d 1029; Matter of Davies v. Davies, supra). Accordingly, the order must be reversed and the matter remitted to Family Court to permit the required review of the child's best interest.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Family Court of Delaware County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.


Summaries of

Matter of Williams v. Mullineaux

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 20, 2000
271 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Williams v. Mullineaux

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LORRI WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STEVEN MULLINEAUX…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 20, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 227

Citing Cases

Zelodius v. Danny

Before: Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ. Liberally construing the allegations of…

Smith v. Bombard

As to Family Court's modification of its prior order issued nearly two months after respondent filed his…