From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tumini

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 23, 1990
574 A.2d 599 (Pa. 1990)

Opinion

No. 332 Disciplinary Docket No. 1.

Argued May 11, 1990.

Decided May 23, 1990.

Gail M. Richman, Philadelphia, for petitioner.

Stephanie Resnick, Louis W. Fryman, Philadelphia, for respondent.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.


ORDER


Report and Recommendations of Disciplinary Board dated January 9, 1990, accepted, and the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Matter of Tumini

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 23, 1990
574 A.2d 599 (Pa. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Tumini

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Alfonso A. TUMINI Petition for Reinstatement

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 23, 1990

Citations

574 A.2d 599 (Pa. 1990)
574 A.2d 599

Citing Cases

Rosario v. Williams

See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 839 F.2d 175, 181 (3d Cir. 1988); Commonwealth ex rel. Baldwin v. Richard,…