From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Szucs v. Recore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1994
209 A.D.2d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 10, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Torraca, J.).


Based on the evidence presented, which included information that petitioner had made repeated threats against his family, it was not irrational for respondent to rescind petitioner's prior approval to participate in the temporary release program. Because temporary release is a discretionary program and a privilege, petitioner had no due process entitlement to continued participation in the program. Any remaining contentions raised by petitioner have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Szucs v. Recore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1994
209 A.D.2d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Szucs v. Recore

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STEPHAN SZUCS, Appellant, v. JAMES RECORE, as Temporary…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 473

Citing Cases

Roucchio v. Coughlin

According to the defendants, the clear language of the applicable statute and regulations negates the…

Yorro v. Ledbetter

“It is well settled that participation in a temporary release program is a privilege, not a right.” (Matter…