From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shattenkirk v. Finnerty

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 29, 1984
468 N.E.2d 53 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1984

Decided June 29, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Harold J. Hughes, J.

Bartley J. Costello, III, John J. Ciavardoni and William F. Sheehan for appellants.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Peter H. Schiff and Alan W. Rubenstein of counsel), for respondent.



Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division ( 97 A.D.2d 51).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Matter of Shattenkirk v. Finnerty

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 29, 1984
468 N.E.2d 53 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Shattenkirk v. Finnerty

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHARLES SHATTENKIRK et al., Appellants, v. MICHAEL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 29, 1984

Citations

468 N.E.2d 53 (N.Y. 1984)
468 N.E.2d 53
479 N.Y.S.2d 215

Citing Cases

Matter of Altruda v. Forsythe

Petitioners, employees of the Insurance Department holding competitive and noncompetitive civil service…

Council for Hous. v. Abrams

ation may be excused (see, State Administrative Procedure Act § 202 [c]). While compliance with the letter of…