From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Saccoccio v. Lange

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 1993
194 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 28, 1993

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County.


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The dismissal of criminal charges against the petitioner cannot bar a subsequent proceeding by the County Attorney to revoke the petitioner's pistol permit based on the same incident. The District Attorney's office and the County of Westchester are separate entities which do not stand in sufficient relationship with each other to warrant the invocation of the doctrine of collateral estoppel (see, e.g., Brown v. City of New York, 60 N.Y.2d 897, 898-899; Nelson v. Dufficy, 104 A.D.2d 234; Doe v. City of Mount Vernon, 156 A.D.2d 329). Moreover, we cannot say on this record that the respondent Judge's determination was arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion. Therefore, the determination will not be disturbed. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Rosenblatt, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Saccoccio v. Lange

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 1993
194 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Saccoccio v. Lange

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SALVATORE SACCOCCIO, Petitioner, v. KENNETH LANGE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 28, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
599 N.Y.S.2d 306

Citing Cases

Warner v. City of New York

The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff's failed to demonstrate their prima facie…

Reynolds v. State

The remaining cases are as unconvincing as Brabson, because they rely on conclusory assertions and circular…