From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Phillies

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 31, 1962
12 N.Y.2d 876 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Submitted October 22, 1962

Decided December 31, 1962

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department.

James O. Moore, Jr., for motion.

Hugh McM. Russ, Jr., and William H. Gardner opposed.


Motion denied.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, BURKE and FOSTER. Judges FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS concur in the following memorandum: We do not agree that grievous error was committed by the learned Referee in securing a copy of the provisions of the New York City Police Department Rules and Procedures adopted pursuant to law (Public Officers Law, § 66-a). A trial or appellate court may take judicial notice of a rule or regulation of an executive department or officer of any city within the State (Civ. Prac. Act, § 344-a, subd. A, par. 4; Administrative Code of City of New York, § 982-8.0).


Summaries of

Matter of Phillies

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 31, 1962
12 N.Y.2d 876 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

Matter of Phillies

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GEORGE E. PHILLIES and JAMES T. SANDORO, Attorneys…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 31, 1962

Citations

12 N.Y.2d 876 (N.Y. 1962)
237 N.Y.S.2d 347
187 N.E.2d 797

Citing Cases

People v. Mortel

Although the Court of Appeals did not specifically explain its rationale as to why such procedures may be…

People v. Mortel

Although the Court of Appeals did not specifically explain its rationale as to why such procedures may be…