Opinion
Argued January 11, 1978
Decided February 7, 1978
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.
Eugene J. Fox, Corporation Counsel (Richard L. Steer of counsel), for appellants.
James J. Brady and James R. Sandner for respondent.
MEMORANDUM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the board of education dismissing the respondent reinstated. The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the Appellate Division properly reduced the sanction imposed by appellant board of education upon respondent teacher from dismissal to a temporary suspension without pay. It is now well settled that an administrative penalty is not to be set aside as excessive unless it is so "clearly disproportionate to the offense and completely inequitable in light of the surrounding circumstances" (Kostika v Cuomo, 41 N.Y.2d 673, 676) as to be "shocking to one's sense of fairness" (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233). In view of the potentially harmful effect of respondent's actions upon the young minds entrusted to her care, even as reflected in the hearing panel's recommendation of reassignment, we cannot say that the sanction imposed by the board of education in this case was excessive under this standard.
Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.
Judgment reversed, etc.