From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McDonald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 2000
276 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted September 11, 2000.

October 16, 2000.

In a proceeding to obtain letters of administration for the Estate of Herbert McDonald, the petitioner appeals from a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated September 14, 1999, which, upon an order of the same court, dated July 2, 1999, granting the motion of the objectant, Troy L. Gurganious, for summary judgment dismissing the petition and denying his cross motion for summary judgment, awarded letters of administration to Troy L. Gurganious, as Administrator of the Estate of May McDonald, a/k/a May Lee McDonald.

Altman Altman, Bronx, N.Y. (Joseph A. Altman of counsel), for appellant.

Manton, Sweeney, Gallo, Reich Bolz, LLP, Rego Park, N.Y. (Frank A. Bolz III of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by the petitioner personally.

As the Surrogate's Court properly noted, the petitioner failed to submit legally admissible evidence to support his claim that the marriage at issue was bigamous (see, CPLR 4521, 4540[c]), and failed to rebut the strong presumption favoring the validity of that marriage (see, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson, 896 F. Supp. 318, 321-322; Estate of Brown, 40 N.Y.2d 938, 939; Seidel v. Crown Indus., 132 A.D.2d 729; A. Scheinkman, Practice Commentaries, 14 McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 14, Domestic Relations Law § 6, C6:1 at 29).


Summaries of

Matter of McDonald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 2000
276 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of McDonald

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF HERBERT McDONALD, DECEASED. JAMES PELLMAN, APPELLANT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 16, 2000

Citations

276 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 312

Citing Cases

T.I. v. R.I.

In the State of New York there is a strong presumption favoring the validity of marriages (see Fisher v…

Spalter v. Spalter

The motion court properly determined that the parties' marriage is valid (see Domestic Relations Law §§ 10,…