From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Margaret Schimmel v. Reed

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1976
357 N.E.2d 1016 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued September 14, 1976

Decided October 19, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, DAVID O. BOEHM, J.

Rene H. Reixach for appellants. Frank P. Celona and Charles G. Finch for James Reed, respondent.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Alan W. Rubenstein and Jean M. Coon of counsel), for Abe Lavine, respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 50 A.D.2d 1085). (See, also, Matter of Martin v Lavine, 39 N.Y.2d 72.)

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.


Summaries of

Matter of Margaret Schimmel v. Reed

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1976
357 N.E.2d 1016 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Margaret Schimmel v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARGARET SCHIMMEL et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 19, 1976

Citations

357 N.E.2d 1016 (N.Y. 1976)
357 N.E.2d 1016
389 N.Y.S.2d 361

Citing Cases

Matter of Leone v. Blum

" In our view, this distinction regarding self-maintaining persons is just as valid for other nonrecipients,…

Rice v. Perales

That is, a household cannot receive AFDC benefits for a member who receives SSI. On the other hand, the…