From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lecci v. Looney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 19, 1970
33 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Summary

In Looney, the Appellate Division sustained the constitutionality of Rule 14, Art. 6 of the Rules and Regulations of the Nassau County Police Department which provided, inter alia, that "no member of the Force or Department shall be permitted to be a delegate or representative to, or take active part in any movement for the nomination or election of candidates for political or public office."

Summary of this case from Lecci v. Cahn

Opinion

January 19, 1970


In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to compel respondents to cancel a certain rule of the Rules and Regulations of the respondent Nassau County Police Department, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 7, 1969, which denied the relief sought. Order affirmed, without costs. The subject rule (rule 14, art. 6) provides, inter alia, that "no member of the Force or Department shall be permitted to be a delegate or representative to, or take active part in any movement for the nomination or election of candidates for political office or public office." Petitioner challenges the rule on the grounds that (1) it is illegal, arbitrary and capricious; (2) it abridges the constitutionally guaranteed freedoms of speech, press, assembly and petition; (3) it unreasonably discriminates between police officers of Nassau County and the other citizens of the State; (4) it makes police officers second class citizens; (5) it is vague and self contradictory; and (6) it is predicated on outmoded concepts. We do not agree. In our opinion, the subject rule comports with sound administration policy that the removal of police personnel from active politics and from active participation in any movement for the nomination or election of candidates for political or public office is conducive to the effective maintenance of discipline and the preservation and promotion of the integrity and efficiency of the Police Department and its personnel. Accordingly, the promulgation of the subject rule, applicable to those who seek employment or seek to be retained in the employ of the Police Department, is the Commissioner's prerogative and, in our opinion, is not vulnerable to petitioner's aforesaid challenges ( McAuliffe v. New Bedford, 155 Mass. 216; People ex rel. Masterson v. French, 110 N.Y. 494, 499; cf. People ex rel. Clifford v. Scannell, 74 App. Div. 406, affd. 173 N.Y. 606; United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75; Gray v. Macy, 239 F. Supp. 658.) Beldock, P.J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Lecci v. Looney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 19, 1970
33 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

In Looney, the Appellate Division sustained the constitutionality of Rule 14, Art. 6 of the Rules and Regulations of the Nassau County Police Department which provided, inter alia, that "no member of the Force or Department shall be permitted to be a delegate or representative to, or take active part in any movement for the nomination or election of candidates for political or public office."

Summary of this case from Lecci v. Cahn
Case details for

Matter of Lecci v. Looney

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWARD LECCI, Individually, and as President of the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 19, 1970

Citations

33 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Lecci v. Cahn

Justice Velsor, in a brief, unreported decision, granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint. He…

People v. D.A. Investigators

On a related topic the Court of Appeals has recently said, "[a]lmost 90 years ago, Judge OLIVER WENDELL…