From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lashway v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 8, 2001
281 A.D.2d 735 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 8, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Steven Lashway, Ossining, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Thomas B. Litsky of counsel), New York City, for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from possessing contraband, counterfeiting a document and making a threat. Initially, we note that the Attorney-General concedes, and our review of the record confirms, that there is insufficient evidence to support that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of possessing contraband and counterfeiting. Accordingly, these charges must be annulled and expunged from petitioner's institutional record (see, Matter of Diaz v. Goord, 263 A.D.2d 630; Matter of Smythe v. McClellan, 226 A.D.2d 840, 842).

Turning to the remaining charges, we find that the misbehavior report, together with the information provided by a confidential informant, constitute substantial evidence to support the charge of threatening a correction officer (see, Matter of Abdur-Raheem v. Mann, 85 N.Y.2d 113, 119). Moreover, we are unpersuaded by petitioner's contention that the hearing was untimely. Notwithstanding petitioner's assertion, the seven-day rule is inapplicable (see, 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [a]) because the record discloses that at the time of the incident, petitioner was already in restrictive confinement on an unrelated matter (see, Matter of Headley v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 714; Matter of Nelson v. Selsky, 239 A.D.2d 795). Petitioner's remaining arguments are unpreserved for our review and, in any event, are lacking in merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, on the law, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of the charges of possessing contraband and counterfeiting; petition granted to that extent, respondents are directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner's institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Lashway v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 8, 2001
281 A.D.2d 735 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Lashway v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN LASHWAY, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM D. BROWN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 8, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 735 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 572

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Blackwell v. Goord

In addition, the documentation requested was confidential, the identification of which would have improperly…

Allah v. Greis

Here, plaintiff's disciplinary hearing was conducted 11 days after the Misbehavior Report. During this time…