From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Herlands v. Surpless

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 5, 1940
282 N.Y. 647 (N.Y. 1940)

Opinion

Argued January 9, 1940

Decided March 5, 1940

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, ROSENMAN, J.

William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel ( Oren Clive Herwitz and Paxton Blair of counsel), for appellants.

Richard J. Barry and Harold W. Wolfram for respondents.


Order denying application to cancel subpoena affirmed, without costs. No application was made to modify the subpoena in any aspect. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Herlands v. Surpless

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 5, 1940
282 N.Y. 647 (N.Y. 1940)
Case details for

Matter of Herlands v. Surpless

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM B. HERLANDS, as Commissioner of the Department of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 5, 1940

Citations

282 N.Y. 647 (N.Y. 1940)
26 N.E.2d 800

Citing Cases

Matter of Santangello v. People

Cases holding the denial of an application to quash a subpoena to be a final and appealable order (Matter of…

People v. Winston

Limited in scope, a motion to quash a subpoena generally challenges either the validity of the subpoena or…