From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Green v. Ingrassia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1997
244 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 24, 1997


Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought ( see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v. Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Green v. Ingrassia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1997
244 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Green v. Ingrassia

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NADENE M. GREEN, Petitioner, v. ANGELO J. INGRASSIA, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 24, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 577

Citing Cases

Doe v. Pataki

Hence, Article 78 provides for judicial review of administrative action, and does not generally permit review…