From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dingfeldt v. Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 24, 1936
5 N.E.2d 362 (N.Y. 1936)

Summary

In Matter of Dingfeldt v. Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Co. (272 N.Y. 623) we have made a similar decision against the Albee Godfrey Company where the claimant was its employee.

Summary of this case from Kuhn v. City of New York

Opinion

Argued September 30, 1936

Decided November 24, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Paul Koch, Patrick S. Mason and William Seidl for the appellants.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Dingfeldt v. Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 24, 1936
5 N.E.2d 362 (N.Y. 1936)

In Matter of Dingfeldt v. Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Co. (272 N.Y. 623) we have made a similar decision against the Albee Godfrey Company where the claimant was its employee.

Summary of this case from Kuhn v. City of New York
Case details for

Matter of Dingfeldt v. Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of FRANCES DINGFELDT, Respondent, against ALBEE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 24, 1936

Citations

5 N.E.2d 362 (N.Y. 1936)
5 N.E.2d 362

Citing Cases

Matter of Dingfeldt v. Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Co.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 272 N.Y.…

Matter of Dingfeldt v. Albee Godfrey Whale Creek Co.

"This Court held that the Workmen's Compensation Law of the State of New York applied, that the Federal…