Opinion
November 16, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.).
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, with costs, and that branch of the petitioners' application which was for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon the New York City Housing Authority is denied.
The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the petitioners' application to serve a late notice of claim against the New York City Housing Authority (hereinafter the Housing Authority). The petitioners failed to submit sufficient evidence adequately explaining their delay in serving the Housing Authority with a notice of claim. Further, it is clear that the delay was not attributable to the injured petitioner's infancy ( see, Matter of Turner v. New York City Hous. Auth., 243 A.D.2d 636; Matter of Fallon v. County of Westchester, 184 A.D.2d 510). Similarly, there is no support in the record for the petitioners' conclusory and speculative assertion that the Housing Authority acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days following its accrual or a reasonable time thereafter ( see, Pecchio v. National Safety Envtl., 211 A.D.2d 773; Matter of McAllister v. County of Nassau, 202 A.D.2d 670; see also, Matter of Finneran v. City of New York, 228 A.D.2d 596, 597). There is no evidence in the record that connects the actions of the Housing Authority Police Officers to the underlying incident or the petitioners' allegations of assault, false arrest, and false imprisonment ( see, Matter of Fallon v. County of Westchester, supra, at 511).
Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.