From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Carson v. Lomenzo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 29, 1966
220 N.E.2d 782 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued September 27, 1966

Decided September 29, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, RICHARD J. BOOKHOUT, J.

Philip J. Devine for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Walter J. Hogan and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.



On June 17, 1966, when this proceeding was begun, there was only one petition filed which designated a candidate for the Democratic primary for the office of Assemblyman from the 112th Assembly District. The time for filing any other such designating petition — or a petition for "an opportunity to write in the name of a candidate" — having expired (Election Law, §§ 143, 148, 314 [L. 1966, ch. 106]), there was to be no balloting for the aforesaid office at the primary election and, accordingly, the Democratic nominee had, in truth and fact, been selected (Election Law, § 149).

The petitioner by this proceeding seeks to establish that the nomination has been improperly invalidated by the Secretary of State. Subdivision 2 of section 330 of the Election Law expressly authorizes the petitioner, as Chairman of the Democratic County Committee, to apply for appropriate relief from irregularities in a nomination.

It appears that the defect as to the candidate's name on the designating petition was a typographical error and those who signed the petition were not deceived about the identity of the person whose candidacy they were proposing. Under these circumstances, the error is not fatal and the petitioner is entitled to seek correction nunc pro tunc. (See Matter of Tricario v. Power, 13 N.Y.2d 886.) As for the fact that the declination was timely filed but tardily acknowledged, in the absence of any possibility of fraud, the court at Special Term was eminently justified in directing that the declination be amended nunc pro tunc so as to be in proper form. (Cf. Matter of Battista v. Power, 10 N.Y.2d 867.)

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the order of Special Term reinstated.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING concur.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of Carson v. Lomenzo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 29, 1966
220 N.E.2d 782 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Carson v. Lomenzo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALEXANDER F. CARSON, Appellant, v. JOHN P. LOMENZO, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 29, 1966

Citations

220 N.E.2d 782 (N.Y. 1966)
220 N.E.2d 782
274 N.Y.S.2d 129

Citing Cases

Matter of Verity v. Cristenfeld

The petitioner by this proceeding seeks to establish that the nomination of Mr. DeMeo has been improperly…

Matter of Kress v. Bd. of Elections

There the certificate of acceptance was permitted to be filed at a later date nunc pro tunc. Where a…