From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Caggiano v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 6, 1974
44 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

May 6, 1974


In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to compel the return of a certain amount of money ($660), the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 13, 1973, which inter alia granted the application. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Even assuming that petitioner's money was legally seized by the police upon his arrest, the subsequent dismissal of the criminal charges raised a duty upon the authorities to return the money upon petitioner's demand. An arbitrary and capricious refusal to return the money upon due demand may properly be reviewed in an article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus (cf. McClendon v. Rossetti, 460 F.2d 111). Martuscello, Acting P.J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur. [ 78 Misc.2d 187.]


Summaries of

Matter of Caggiano v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 6, 1974
44 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Matter of Caggiano v. Frank

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN M. CAGGIANO, Respondent, v. LOUIS FRANK, as Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 6, 1974

Citations

44 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Marshall v. Soares

We affirm. While this CPLR article 78 proceeding was an appropriate vehicle for petitioner to seek the return…

Shechter v. Comptroller of City of New York

In fact, no notice of claim is necessary in order to bring an Article 78 proceeding. See In re Caggiano, 78…