From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bd. of Educ. of Northport-East v. Ambach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 20, 1983
60 N.Y.2d 758 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued September 19, 1983

Decided October 20, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, ROBERT C. WILLIAMS, J.

John H. Gross for Board of Education of Northport-East Northport Union Free School District, appellant.

John P. Bracken, guardian ad litem, for intervenors-appellants.

James H. Whitney, Robert D. Stone and Seth Rockmuller for respondents.



MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, to the respondents against the board of education.

We would note that under the circumstances of this case the petitioning students had no reasonable expectation of receiving a high school diploma without passing competency tests. Nor on the record can it be said that they were denied adequate notice of the requirement, in view of the fact that the regulation had been in effect for three years prior to the completion of their studies. For the reasons stated in the opinion of Presiding Justice A. FRANKLIN MAHONEY at the Appellate Division, the petitioners' other contentions do not warrant the relief requested.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of Bd. of Educ. of Northport-East v. Ambach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 20, 1983
60 N.Y.2d 758 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Matter of Bd. of Educ. of Northport-East v. Ambach

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BOARD OF EDUCATION OF NORTHPORT-EAST NORTHPORT UNION FREE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 20, 1983

Citations

60 N.Y.2d 758 (N.Y. 1983)
469 N.Y.S.2d 669
457 N.E.2d 775

Citing Cases

Abroon v. Gurwin Home Care Agency, Inc.

"The Court observes that the Defendant in substance contends that the Plaintiff rather than the Defendant…

Salmon v. Tamarin

Case law has held that age is not generally considered a "suspect classification" so that the standard of…