Opinion
Argued March 7, 1895
Decided March 19, 1895
William H. Stayton for appellant.
Matthew Hale for respondent.
FINCH, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Bateman
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1895
40 N.E. 10 (N.Y. 1895)
Summaries of
Matter of Bateman
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1895
40 N.E. 10 (N.Y. 1895)
Case details for
Matter of Bateman
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Assignment of ARTHUR E. BATEMAN for the Benefit of…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 19, 1895
Citations
40 N.E. 10 (N.Y. 1895)
40 N.E. 10
71 N.Y. St. Rptr. 289
Citing Cases
People v. Cammarata
In my opinion, the testimony with regard to a particular telephone conversation offered by defendant and…
Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. National City BankThe defendant bank never communicated with the customer of the foreign bank, who was the buyer of the goods,…