From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Allstate Insurance Company v. Libow

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 28, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 807 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued May 30, 1985

Decided June 28, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Charles R. Rubin, J.

James Cohen and Daniel Cohen for appellant.

J. Irwin Shapiro and Daniel Kolko for respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by former Justice Seymour Boyers at the Appellate Division ( 106 A.D.2d 110). We note, however, that the regulations of the Superintendent of Insurance (11 N.Y.CRR 60.1 [a]) construe Vehicle and Traffic Law § 311 (4) (a) which contains language equivalent to the former Insurance Law § 167 (2-a) (now codified at § 3420 [f] [1]) at issue here.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and BOOMER. Taking no part: Judge MEYER.

Designated pursuant to N Y Constitution, article VI, § 2.


Summaries of

Matter of Allstate Insurance Company v. Libow

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 28, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 807 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Allstate Insurance Company v. Libow

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. PEARL LIBOW…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 28, 1985

Citations

65 N.Y.2d 807 (N.Y. 1985)
493 N.Y.S.2d 127
482 N.E.2d 923

Citing Cases

MATTER OF TIP TOP MANAGEMENT

Where the Issues concern the interpretation of a statute or regulation, the interpretations afforded by the…

Zucker v. Hirschl Adler

( See, Ore Rev Stat § 359.210 [1] [b]; § 359.225 [emphasis added].) However, where, as here, the explicit…