From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matrana v. Avondale Indus.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Aug 27, 2001
803 So. 2d 59 (La. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 2001-C-1505

August 27, 2001

ON APPLICATION FOR WRITS DIRECTED TO CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH, NO. 99-14061, DIVISION "G-11", HONORABLE ROBIN M. GIARRUSSO, JUDGE.

Steven M. Jupiter, LeBlanc Waddell, L.L.C., New Orleans, Counsel for Plaintiff/Respondent.

Brian C. Bossier, Mickal P. Adler, Marc E. Devenport, Erin H. Boyd, Blue Williams, L.L.P., Metairie, Counsel for Defendant/Relator.

COURT COMPOSED OF JUDGE STEVEN R. PLOTKIN, JUDGE MICHAEL E. KIRBY, JUDGE MAX N. TOBIAS, JR.


WRIT DENIED

The issues raised by the application for supervisory writs have been presented to this court repetitively. In Callaway v. Anco Insulation, Inc., 98-0397 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/25/98), 714 So.2d 730, writ denied, 98-1034 (La. 11/19/99), 749 So.2d 666, we held that a cause of action for occupational diseases, such as asbestosis and mesothelioma, arises when the injured party is exposed to the toxic substance that causes the disease. See Cole v. Celotex, 599 So.2d 1058 (La. 1992). Accord Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 00-352 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/11/01), 804 So.2d 11, 2001 WL 360814. In Gautreaux v. Rheem Mfg. Co., 96-2193 (La.App. 4 Cir. 12/27/96), 694 So.2d 977, we held that asbestos was not listed substance that, when it caused disease, was covered by workers' compensation. Accordingly, we decline to follow Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc., 34,495 (La.App. 2 Cir. 4/4/01), 785 So.2d 177, or Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 99-1354 (La.App. 5 Cir. 12/5/00), 772 So.2d 974, writ not considered, 2001-0171 (La. 3/23/01), 787 So.2d 1006.


Summaries of

Matrana v. Avondale Indus.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Aug 27, 2001
803 So. 2d 59 (La. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Matrana v. Avondale Indus.

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS MATRANA v. AVONDALE INDUSTRIES, INC., et al

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 27, 2001

Citations

803 So. 2d 59 (La. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc.

necessarily be oxygen compounds for purposes of former Subsection (d). 694 So. 2d at 978; see alsoCalloway v.…

Rando v. Anco Insulations, 2008-1163

The court then noted that asbestos is a compound that contains oxygen, but found that all compounds that…