From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Massik v. Zimmerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 27, 1966
26 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

October 27, 1966

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ. [ 48 Misc.2d 217.]


Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: By reason of the provisions of CPLR 302 (subd. [a], par. 2) personal jurisdiction over the defendant, a nondomiciliary at the time of service but who was a New York domiciliary at the time of the commission of alleged tortious acts within the State, was effected by personal service outside the State. (See State of New York v. Davies, 24 A.D.2d 240.)


Summaries of

Massik v. Zimmerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 27, 1966
26 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Massik v. Zimmerman

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE MASSIK, Appellant, v. DONALD ZIMMERMAN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Goodemote v. McClain

"3. while jurisdiction over the person of the defendant can be obtained without personal delivery of the…

Duke v. Housen

See as well, Yarusso v. Arbotowicz, 1977, 41 N.Y.2d 516, 393 N YS.2d 968, 362 N.E.2d 600; Goodemote v.…