From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Massey v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Dec 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 3:12-3483-TMC (D.S.C. Dec. 19, 2013)

Summary

finding the same

Summary of this case from Shivers v. Colvin

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12-3483-TMC

12-19-2013

Johnnie Massey, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff Johnnie Massey ("Massey") brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying her claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of the United States Magistrate Judge, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(a), D.S.C. (ECF No. 14). The Report recommends that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and remanded, pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with the Report. On December 18, 2013, the Commissioner filed a notice of her intent not to file objections to the Report. (ECF No. 17).

The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). In the absence of objections, this court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). Rather, "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note).

After a thorough and careful review of the record, the court adopts the Report of the Magistrate Judge which is incorporated herein by reference. The Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Timothy M. Cain

United States District Judge
December 19, 2013
Anderson, South Carolina


Summaries of

Massey v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Dec 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 3:12-3483-TMC (D.S.C. Dec. 19, 2013)

finding the same

Summary of this case from Shivers v. Colvin
Case details for

Massey v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:Johnnie Massey, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Dec 19, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:12-3483-TMC (D.S.C. Dec. 19, 2013)

Citing Cases

Shivers v. Colvin

Importantly, however, as the Magistrate Judge noted, the District of South Carolina has repeatedly found that…

Owens v. Berryhill

However, the ALJ limited Plaintiff's RFC to simple, routine, repetitive tasks (R.p. 42); and numerous courts…