rejecting alternative liability theory in the absence of joinder of all possible defendants because application of theory "would beg the question of causation entirely."
Summary of this case from 210 East 86th Street Corp. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.No. 83-1197.
March 19, 1984, OCTOBER TERM, 1983.
C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 710 F. 2d 1480.
rejecting alternative liability theory in the absence of joinder of all possible defendants because application of theory "would beg the question of causation entirely."
Summary of this case from 210 East 86th Street Corp. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.declining retroactive application of a shorter statute of limitations
Summary of this case from Gibson v. United Statesrefusing to apply enterprise liability because Louisiana courts had not addressed the issue
Summary of this case from Santiago v. Sherwin-Williams Co.declining retroactive application of a shorter statute of limitations
Summary of this case from Guzman v. Van DemarkFull title:MASON ET AL. v. BURGER KING CORP
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 19, 1984
Other jurisdictions have also refused to apply the alternative liability theory in the context of…
Peterkin v. JeffesSee Union County Jail Inmates v. DiBuono, 713 F.2d 984, 999 (3d Cir. 1983) (in a challenge to jail…