From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marty v. Bainter

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 12, 1999
727 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

stating that an award of attorney fees and costs predicated on a reversed or vacated final judgment also must be reversed

Summary of this case from Ocean Club Comm. Ass'n, v. Curtis

Opinion

No. 98-599

Opinion filed March 12, 1999

An appeal from the Circuit Court, Alachua County; Chester B. Chance, Judge.

Milton H. Baxley II, Gainesville, for Appellant.

Ross T. Clark, Law Offices of Bateh Clark, Jacksonville; and Michael J. Korn of Korn Zehmer, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.


This is the second time this court has been asked to review actions taken by the lower tribunal in connection with the underlying litigation between the parties to this appeal. In the first appeal, appellant sought reversal of orders of the circuit court dismissing appellant's appeal of an arbitration award, confirming the arbitration award, and awarding the amount of money damages set by the arbitrator. Because the circuit court was acting in its appellate capacity, this court treated the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, granted the petition, and quashed the order under review. The order was quashed because the circuit court did not give appellant the required 10-day notice before imposing the sanction of dismissal due to appellant's failure to comply with the appellate rules. See Marty v. Bainter, 709 So.2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) ( Marty I).

During the pendency of the prior appeal, the circuit court, acting in its capacity as a trial court, entered final judgment awarding attorney's fees and costs in favor of appellee. The award was predicated on the final judgment for money damages in favor of appellee as a result of the arbitration, which judgment subsequently was reversed by this court's decision in Marty I.

Once a final judgment is reversed and remanded by an appellate court, there can be no prevailing party for purposes of an award of prevailing party attorney's fees. Consequently, an award of attorney's fees and costs predicated on a reversed or vacated final judgment also must be reversed. See Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner's, Inc., 614 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Association Financial Services, Inc. v. Lewis, 551 So.2d 590, 591 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Thornburg v. Pursell, 476 So.2d 323, 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Appellee in this case properly concedes the award of attorney's fees and costs should be reversed, pending the final disposition of the underlying judgment.

Accordingly, the appealed final judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings, pending the ultimate disposition of appellant's appeal of the arbitration award and final judgment in favor of appellee, the plaintiff in the proceedings in the lower tribunal.

MINER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Marty v. Bainter

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 12, 1999
727 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

stating that an award of attorney fees and costs predicated on a reversed or vacated final judgment also must be reversed

Summary of this case from Ocean Club Comm. Ass'n, v. Curtis
Case details for

Marty v. Bainter

Case Details

Full title:MARCEL E. MARTY, Appellant, v. PATRICK J. BAINTER, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 12, 1999

Citations

727 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Bird

And inasmuch as Borrowers are not entitled to contractual attorney's fees, they are also not entitled to…

Waterview Towers Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. City of W. Palm Beach

The issue presented in this case is the award of attorney's fees and costs to Palm Harbor Hotel. The…