From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 30, 1966
192 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 35643.

November 30, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District.

Harold Ungerleider, Miami, for petitioner.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


This cause is here on a petition for writ of certiorari supported by certificate of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, that its decision is one which involves a question of great public interest. See Section 4(2), Article V, Constitution of Florida, F.S.A

The factual circumstances, background and questions involved are set forth in the decision of the District Court reported at 188 So.2d 684.

The writ issued and oral argument by the parties has been heard. We hold that the District Court of Appeal correctly decided the issue before it, and we adopt such as the ruling of this court.

The writ of certiorari is accordingly

Discharged.

THORNAL, C.J., DREW, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WAYBRIGHT, Circuit Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Martin v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 30, 1966
192 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Martin v. State

Case Details

Full title:HYMAN MARTIN, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 30, 1966

Citations

192 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 1966)

Citing Cases

Martin v. State

The validity of the subpoena was upheld both by this court and the Supreme Court of Florida. See State ex…

AGO

See generally, 67 C.J.S. Officers s 197. If a statute imposes a duty on a public officer to accomplish a…