From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Rother

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jul 13, 1927
113 So. 713 (Fla. 1927)

Opinion

Opinion Filed July 13, 1927.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; H. F. Atkinson, Judge.

Reversed in part.

Shutts Bowen and L. S. Julian, for Appellant;

W. F. Brown, M. S. Bobst and Roy S. Wood, for Appellee.


This was a suit in equity by a material man against the owner to enforce an alleged material man's lien against the real estate and buildings erected thereon, as described in the bill of complaint. It does not appear that the heirs of John H. Havlin were necessary parties to the suit. Title to the land might have been in the executrix of John H. Havlin.

Decree was in favor of the complainant for the sum of $442.54 principal, $95.70 interest, and $53.82 as fee for Complainant's Solicitor.

The record discloses no reversible error except that committed by the Chancellor in entering the decree for solicitor's fees.

That part of the decree allowing fees for complainant's solicitor should be reversed upon authority of the opinion in the case of Palm Beach Bank Trust Company v. Lainhart et al., 84 Fla. 662; and Crim et al. v. Drake, 86 Fla. 470 and cases there cited, and should otherwise be affirmed. Chapter 9323, Acts of 1923, does not cure the unconstitutionality of Section 3525, Revised General Statutes. The cost of this appeal should be taxed against the Complainant, the Appellee here, and it is so ordered.

Reversed in part.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur in the opinion.


The basis of classification involved in Chapter 9323, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1923, is distinguishable from that involved in the Texas statute construed and held valid in M. K. T. Ry. Co. v. Cade, 233 U.S. 642; 58 L.Ed. 1135, both as to the classes of debtors affected and as to the amount contemplated and the latter being recognized as an element properly considered in determining the reasonableness of a classification. S. A. L. Ry. v. Seegers, 207 U.S. 73.


Summaries of

Martin v. Rother

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jul 13, 1927
113 So. 713 (Fla. 1927)
Case details for

Martin v. Rother

Case Details

Full title:KATE HAVLIN MARTIN, EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JOHN H…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Jul 13, 1927

Citations

113 So. 713 (Fla. 1927)
113 So. 713

Citing Cases

Hunter v. Flowers

" In the Chillingworth case, the court did not have before it the question of the constitutionality of that…