From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marquinez v. Dole Food Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
May 29, 2018
No. 14-4245 (3d Cir. May. 29, 2018)

Opinion

No. 14-4245

05-29-2018

LUIS ANTONIO AGUILAR MARQUINEZ, et al. v. DOLE FOOD COMPANY INC., et al. Luis Antonio Aguilar Marquinez, et al., Appellants


On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware
(D.C. No. 1-12-cv-00695)
District Judge: Honorable Leonard P. Stark Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
March 9, 2017 Before: HARDIMAN and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges, and STENGEL, District Judge. ORDER

The Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

In this appeal from a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Stark, J.), the panel (Hardiman, Krause, and Stengel, JJ.) certified a question of law to the Delaware Supreme Court pursuant to Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule Misc. 110.1. The Delaware Supreme Court accepted certification and issued an opinion holding that under Delaware law, the dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims in 1995 by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Delgado v. Shell Oil Co., 890 F. Supp. 1324, 1375 (S.D. Tex. 1995), did not end the tolling of the Delaware statute of limitations on personal injury actions, 10 Del. C. § 8119. See Marquinez v. Dow Chem. Co., A.3d, No. 231, 2017, 2018 WL 1324178, at *1 (Del. Mar. 15, 2018). The opinion of the Delaware Supreme Court requires us to vacate the summary judgment that had been entered in favor of Defendants.

While this appeal was pending, this Court decided a related case, Chavez v. Dole Food Co., 836 F.3d 205 (3d Cir. 2016) (en banc). There, we held that the District Court had erred in dismissing the plaintiffs' claims in that case on first-filed grounds under circumstances materially identical to those in which it dismissed the claims of fourteen plaintiffs in this case on September 19, 2013. In light of Chavez, the District Court's dismissal order was erroneous.

Upon consideration of the record before us, the Delaware Supreme Court's opinion in Marquinez, and this Court's opinion in Chavez,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the District Court's orders entered September 19, 2013, and May 27, 2014, and its final judgment entered September 22, 2014, are VACATED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal is REMANDED to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with the Delaware Supreme Court's opinion in Marquinez and this Court's opinion in Chavez.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Thomas M . Hardiman

Circuit Judge Dated: May 29, 2018


Summaries of

Marquinez v. Dole Food Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
May 29, 2018
No. 14-4245 (3d Cir. May. 29, 2018)
Case details for

Marquinez v. Dole Food Co.

Case Details

Full title:LUIS ANTONIO AGUILAR MARQUINEZ, et al. v. DOLE FOOD COMPANY INC., et al…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Date published: May 29, 2018

Citations

No. 14-4245 (3d Cir. May. 29, 2018)

Citing Cases

Marquinez, v. Dole Food Co.

In fact, after the Delaware Supreme Court held in this case that “the dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims in…

Chavez v. Occidental Chem. Corp.

On May 29, 2018, after receiving the Delaware Supreme Court's response to the certified question, the Third…