From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marlow v. Marsh

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1858
9 Cal. 259 (Cal. 1858)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District, County of Nevada.

         COUNSEL:

         Francis J. Dunn, for Appellants.

          McConnell & Niles, and A. A. Sargent, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          FIELD, Judge

         The defendant was indicted for an assault with a deadly weapon with intent to inflict great bodily injury. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and the jury found him " guilty of an assault with a deadly weapon." The Court sentenced the prisoner to two years' imprisonment in the State Prison, and the defendant appealed.

         The offense of which the prisoner was found guilty by the jury, was not a felony, but a simple assault. This is conceded by the Attorney-General. (People v. Vanard , 6 Cal. 562.)

         The Court, therefore, erred in assessing the punishment. (Wood's Digest, 335, Sec. 49.)

         The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Marlow v. Marsh

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1858
9 Cal. 259 (Cal. 1858)
Case details for

Marlow v. Marsh

Case Details

Full title:MARLOW et al. v. MARSH et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1858

Citations

9 Cal. 259 (Cal. 1858)

Citing Cases

Morris v. De Celis

         There was, therefore, no basis to support an order setting aside the verdict of the jury, and the…

Skillman v. Riley

          FIELD, Judge          The papers embodied in the transcript, purporting to be a statement, are…